Home » attain alternatives blog » Managed Futures Mutual Funds September Update

Managed Futures Mutual Funds September Update

With the books closed on September, it’s time to update our look at so-called managed futures mutual funds. Once again, the results aren’t pretty (for the mutual funds): on average, they’re lagging the benchmark managed futures indices by -7.59% after the effect of load fees (and -3.25% before load fees). Only AQR Managed Futures Strategy managed to stay ahead of the average of the three major managed futures indices (after considering load fees).

Despite our misgivings about managed futures mutual funds, new contenders have continued to pop up since we conducted our original investigation of these funds. Some of the funds that have launched recently include the Taylor Xplor Managed Futures Strategy Fund (TMFIX), Global Managed Futures Strategy Fund (RYSQX), and another ETF: the Horizons Auspice Managed Futures Index (HMF.TO). Once these new funds have established a track record long enough for comparison, we will begin recording their performance in our tracking table.

We don’t think mutual funds are the best vehicle to access the managed futures asset class if you have the capital to stand on your own and invest in individually managed accounts (see after the chart for why), and the numbers continue to back us up. Read ‘em and weep below (Disclaimer: past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results).

Click to embiggen.

Sorted by YTD Return After Load

Earlier this year we expanded our look at managed futures mutual funds to consider the new entrants into the space. We have been critical of these products for a few reasons. For one, they are being marketed as managed futures products, but many do not contain any actual managed futures exposure; rather they merely utilize a trend following model to approximate such exposure. Then there are some that actually do invest in underlying managed futures managers (kudos to you), but do so at a very high cost with extra layers of fees and, more often than not, a high front end sales (load) fee.  And then there are those which are not providing managed futures exposure and charging load fees: the worst of the worst. Although the load fees may be waived for investors hitting certain “breakpoints” due to larger investments, we still feel the bulk of these funds will underperform the managed futures indices even without the hefty load fees.