Another month is on the books, so it’s time to update our look at so-called managed futures mutual funds. Once again, the results aren’t pretty (for the mutual funds): on average, they’re lagging the benchmark managed futures indices by -8.93% after the effect of load fees (and -3.49% before load fees). A few of the funds are beating the benchmark indices before considering the load fee (RTSRX, QMFAX, and MFTAX), but that advantage evaporates after the fees are considered.
We don’t think mutual funds are the best vehicle to access the managed futures asset class if you have the capital to stand on your own and invest in individually managed accounts (see after the chart for why), and the numbers continue to back us up. Read ‘em and weep below (Disclaimer: past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results).
Sorted by YTD Return After Load
Earlier this year we expanded our look at managed futures mutual funds to consider the new entrants into the space. We have been critical of these products for a few reasons. For one, they are being marketed as managed futures products, but many do not contain any actual managed futures exposure; rather they merely utilize a trend following model to approximate such exposure. Then there are some that actually do invest in underlying managed futures managers (kudos to you), but do so at a very high cost with extra layers of fees and, more often than not, a high front end sales (load) fee. And then there are those which are not providing managed futures exposure and charging load fees: the worst of the worst.